0

Play Now

Click to Copy IP

Serious issue with the "AntiCheat" system on the server. Have you been false banned? tell us your story.

Serious poll: Have you been fals banned by the "Anti-cheat" system of Invadedlands?


  • Total voters
    38

Serious issue with the "AntiCheat" system on the server. Have you been false banned? tell us your story.

Interesting. Thank you for taking your time on this thread. So I guess we should not really be grinding creepers then? or not use our fist to punch it? there is a chance of it happening
Basically if you want me to get into technical stuff using a fist doesnt have the same damage rate as a sword as the sword is a entity that can be transfered around, and a fist is always there. This means the the UUOL in the SD data base we have may be outdated and need to be updated. This is being fixed in the next patch as said earlier.
 
The thing is, even if he didn't get false banned, there is still a problem with the anti cheat. The number of false bans recently is outstanding, and should be fixed. Watchdog, I think is a good system which rarely false bans, it does that because it takes a lot longer to be 100% sure that they are hacking, while it seems that here they anti-cheat straight up false bans. This is not just him, multiple people are getting false banned (including me) and I think this should be fixed.



@TehNeon

you did not just call watchdog good wtf i've saw kids bhop and 10 block without getting insta banned
 
you did not just call watchdog good wtf i've saw kids bhop and 10 block without getting insta banned
That's my point, watchdog takes longer to ban hackers (as it bans in waves), but with a lot les false bans. I honestly think thats a better system.
 
That's my point, watchdog takes longer to ban hackers (as it bans in waves), but with a lot les false bans. I honestly think thats a better system.

so you'd rather get bhopped on in your best gear and die/ruin the dura in it? or would you rather they got insta banend
 
Nope. Clicking 25 cps is bannable that's why butterfly clicking is use at your own risk. Your ban is justified. Read the rules next time.
I thought that the anti-cheat would think that I used an auto clicker if I click that fast. Now I know it's bannable. Pat_3, what is the cps limit?
 
I thought that the anti-cheat would think that I used an auto clicker if I click that fast. Now I know it's bannable. Pat_3, what is the cps limit?

also if you're clicking 20+ cps to kill MOBS you're probably autoclicking theres no need to click that fast on mobs lmfao
 
Hell yeah false banned twice i got banned for using my /fly in spawn lmfao and I lagged in spleef in once and got banned by anticheat....
 
Did you read he said it's good at not false banning but is really slow at catching hackers

watchdog isn’t the best at catching hackers it’s easy to bypass banwaves, even with 3.2 reach and if you would rather get bhopped on and probably die because staff couldn’t tp fast enough then complain about it then watchdog would be the better option
 
watchdog isn’t the best at catching hackers it’s easy to bypass banwaves, even with 3.2 reach and if you would rather get bhopped on and probably die because staff couldn’t tp fast enough then complain about it then watchdog would be the better option
agc is the best
 
They were clearly using UUOL spoofing and QDZ hopping. In our database the records showed that they were clearly hacking. To put it simply you basically ate toast without putting the butter on. Or the cheese on. Or whatever you put on your toast. Let it be that it shows that you did that. You just didn't hide your hacks correctly.
 
As a developer of this anti cheat (agc) the mobs you were clicking coming in stacks could have set of COIL and CKV alerts both of which would be false. We are fixing this issue in the next update of agc.
agc on invaded is super old though, doubt its the problem with your development
 
General Discussion
Back