They dont tell you exactly why your banned for because it all falls in one category 'cheating' so you either were cheating or glitched in a block or levitating on accident or more
Bans
- Thread starter FrostyyMC
- Start date
- Status
How?
K well then if I shud report you for your macro
snitch
Yea ik
Yes it can get you banned. It is technically a macro.
Ikr duhhhhHhHhHhHhHhHhHhHhHhHM RuLES ARe MADE tO bE bRken
I stopped but i used it and i never actually used it and then i stopped when i considered it a cheat so gl
Last edited:
1+, I don't play anything but KitPvP on IL, but on most servers, a macro for a command or something is allowed and sometimes the server even specify that it's not bannable because of how many people think it is, you didn't harm anyone and it's fair play, 100% false ban.
hmmm.... it is a macro sooo......
So what? Selling stuff quicker is considered as cheating?
Do I fly or hit people faster with it?
I completely agree with this.
The current invaded punishment system needs a serious rework without having such forceful guidelines.
I've never been staff on a server that had a punishment system like invaded, rarely mutes were ever perm, let alone over 3 days unless its something really bad. Having a warning system or even just asking players to stop doing what there doing before a punishment can be given is way better then just immediate ban/mute for something that couldve been stopped by a staff member saying stop.
In general, invaded doesnt need to actually do anything for the server if they dont want to. Having 2 youtubers play is enough to keep the playerbase up and never have to worry about losing money or players. If you really think about it, invaded may be a 400-500 player server, but skeppy could fill the server in a matter of seconds with 1 twitter, insta or youtube video/post.
Due to that, they really dont need to rework anything if they dont want to. But invaded really needs to start focusing on the players who actually play the server because they find it fun, and players that are bigger within the community. The amount of people leaving the server right now is a lot, but it doesnt matter in the end due to the power skeppy has over the server.
I also have staffed on servers with youtubers and currently am, so you cant tell me that "this is how it needs to be for a popular server". No it doesnt, there is multiple different ways it can be improved to help create a more healthy environment for old and new players to be able to play. Warning system would be a absolute dream, and also just a general rework of scenarios and how mutes should work.
In the server im currently staff on, if a player is spamming they are told to stop, if they dont stop they receive a warning. This warning lasts for 1 week before resetting, if the player makes it through the week without breaking another rule associated to the warn, the warn expires and they are back to square 1. If they do break a rule associating to the warn, they will get muted for however long seems appropriate. All mutes regarding spam and most common chat offenses (caps, char spam, links etc) will only be up to 15m-1h depending on the severity. The only mutes that exceed this are obvious ones (racism, anything sexual, homophobic you get the gist).
Having players muted for sending 3 messages that are similar is insane, a easy "please dont repeat messages" goes a longer way then a 3 day mute that just says "Spam"
Players shouldn't be seeing the player reports section as a "easy report" for staff to mute someone. Its really corrupt, as player reports are meant for players breaking a rule. I understand that chat offenses are breaking rules, but that goes to my way of saying that they aren't even bad and would go a lot better with a warn/verbal warn. Player Reports should be more used for toxicity, hacking and other more malicious situations.
Take what you want from this, but we all know that the current punishment system is fucked and needs a rework
EDIT: If you have any questions, feel free to ask, im super open on the fact that I dont agree and I also wrote this at 5 am on my phone lol, so it may be worded bad.
The current invaded punishment system needs a serious rework without having such forceful guidelines.
I've never been staff on a server that had a punishment system like invaded, rarely mutes were ever perm, let alone over 3 days unless its something really bad. Having a warning system or even just asking players to stop doing what there doing before a punishment can be given is way better then just immediate ban/mute for something that couldve been stopped by a staff member saying stop.
In general, invaded doesnt need to actually do anything for the server if they dont want to. Having 2 youtubers play is enough to keep the playerbase up and never have to worry about losing money or players. If you really think about it, invaded may be a 400-500 player server, but skeppy could fill the server in a matter of seconds with 1 twitter, insta or youtube video/post.
Due to that, they really dont need to rework anything if they dont want to. But invaded really needs to start focusing on the players who actually play the server because they find it fun, and players that are bigger within the community. The amount of people leaving the server right now is a lot, but it doesnt matter in the end due to the power skeppy has over the server.
I also have staffed on servers with youtubers and currently am, so you cant tell me that "this is how it needs to be for a popular server". No it doesnt, there is multiple different ways it can be improved to help create a more healthy environment for old and new players to be able to play. Warning system would be a absolute dream, and also just a general rework of scenarios and how mutes should work.
In the server im currently staff on, if a player is spamming they are told to stop, if they dont stop they receive a warning. This warning lasts for 1 week before resetting, if the player makes it through the week without breaking another rule associated to the warn, the warn expires and they are back to square 1. If they do break a rule associating to the warn, they will get muted for however long seems appropriate. All mutes regarding spam and most common chat offenses (caps, char spam, links etc) will only be up to 15m-1h depending on the severity. The only mutes that exceed this are obvious ones (racism, anything sexual, homophobic you get the gist).
Having players muted for sending 3 messages that are similar is insane, a easy "please dont repeat messages" goes a longer way then a 3 day mute that just says "Spam"
Players shouldn't be seeing the player reports section as a "easy report" for staff to mute someone. Its really corrupt, as player reports are meant for players breaking a rule. I understand that chat offenses are breaking rules, but that goes to my way of saying that they aren't even bad and would go a lot better with a warn/verbal warn. Player Reports should be more used for toxicity, hacking and other more malicious situations.
Take what you want from this, but we all know that the current punishment system is fucked and needs a rework
EDIT: If you have any questions, feel free to ask, im super open on the fact that I dont agree and I also wrote this at 5 am on my phone lol, so it may be worded bad.
Last edited:
you legit spoke my mind. It's just really unfair on the people who actually enjoy playing that aren't hacking but still managed to get false banned. I was false banned 38 days ago for 'cheating' yet I never cheated and never thought of doing something malicous. I made my appeal and zelkam responded saying 'denied'. then later posted it in a video and started laughing. Honestly the invadedlands community as a whole needs an improvement & skeppy like you said he can just tweet 1 tweet and everybody will start acting 'abit' more mature but its a start. It's all just chaos with invaded how there is always kids spamming in chat for hours on end and not getting muted.
- Status
General Discussion