t
Last edited:
no as there'd be less improvements in survival as a whole, slowly killing the playerbaseWhat if we reset survival every 6 months like normal but 4 months though the season the playerbase votes to see wether or not survival should reset early.
lol no?What if we reset survival every 6 months like normal but 4 months though the season the playerbase votes to see wether or not survival should reset early.
it died like 1month insurvival dies after 4 months so ig
i'd say it's a stupid idea for multiple reasons.What if we reset survival every 6 months like normal but 4 months though the season the playerbase votes to see wether or not survival should reset early.
I like the idea. but for this to be feasible and still have good updates and stuff they need to have more staff to test as well as developers.What if we reset survival every 6 months like normal but 4 months though the season the playerbase votes to see wether or not survival should reset early.
At this point im playing just to build crap lmaoit died like 1month in
we need an update like kit had, a good update
idk how people still played it and grinded for over 2 months this season
shut up pandaMy personal opinion is that if you’re getting bored before the six month point in the reset cycle, resetting the server two months earlier is not really going to change anything.
If you want the game mode to be more interesting, the way to go about it is to suggest key gameplay changes that will keep players around for the long term. To me, that seems like a better solution.
bro tryna get g checked right nowWhat if we reset survival every 6 months like normal but 4 months though the season the playerbase votes to see wether or not survival should reset early.
clk?i now realilocked ?ze how dumb this is i made this half awake
disregardlockd?