0

Play Now

Click to Copy IP

Got Banned 7d for an "exploit" here is what I have to say about it

Got Banned 7d for an "exploit" here is what I have to say about it

vareyne

Well-known member
ryebreadegirl
ryebreadegirl
Now, before you all start going "OMG NOBODY ASKED OMG WE DON'T CARE" Just hear me out this one time thanks.

So, I was banned for something where I am given god mode for an event, but I am at spawn. I can't harm anyone and nobody can harm me. It is just a fun little thing to do, and it kind of spread ever since 1pick streamed it.

Now, here is the problem with my ban. I was not exploiting nor abusing a glitch. I've seen people say that even if you do glitch for anything, you'll get banned, I differ. According to the Invadedlands rules...


Notice how it says "No glitch abusing / exploiting?" Yeah, what I was doing was not an exploit. Here is the dictionary definition of exploit and abuse in case you're not the intelligent type...



Notice how it says "derive benefit" and "bad effect?" Yeah, that's not what I was doing. What am I gaining from not being able to do anything? Nothing, right? So how was I banned for something not on the rules? I used common sense, went to the rules before deciding to do it, and noticed it only said if it is abused or exploited, which it wasn't.

I fail to see how I was exploiting this glitch whatsoever, and I believe I was banned unfairly. Thank you for your time.
 
“no matter your intentions”
Doesn’t matter if it helps you or not, abusing an exploit is punishable.
Like I said, it was not an exploit. an exploit is something you benefit from. Now please tell me how I benefited from this.
 
“no matter your intentions”
It says in the rules. That means you don’t have to benefit from it, it’s still punishable.
That's where you're wrong. It says that only exploited / abused glitches are bannable. If normal glitches were also bannable, they would not have needed the exploited / abused part in it. No matter your intentions is only for if you are abusing a glitch or exploiting one.
 
Now, before you all start going "OMG NOBODY ASKED OMG WE DON'T CARE" Just hear me out this one time thanks.

So, I was banned for something where I am given god mode for an event, but I am at spawn. I can't harm anyone and nobody can harm me. It is just a fun little thing to do, and it kind of spread ever since 1pick streamed it.

Now, here is the problem with my ban. I was not exploiting nor abusing a glitch. I've seen people say that even if you do glitch for anything, you'll get banned, I differ. According to the Invadedlands rules...


Notice how it says "No glitch abusing / exploiting?" Yeah, what I was doing was not an exploit. Here is the dictionary definition of exploit and abuse in case you're not the intelligent type...



Notice how it says "derive benefit" and "bad effect?" Yeah, that's not what I was doing. What am I gaining from not being able to do anything? Nothing, right? So how was I banned for something not on the rules? I used common sense, went to the rules before deciding to do it, and noticed it only said if it is abused or exploited, which it wasn't.

I fail to see how I was exploiting this glitch whatsoever, and I believe I was banned unfairly. Thank you for your time.
L ur mom k
 
Multiple people have been doing this for days but now they decide to ban someone, kind of outrageous but exploits are punishable no matter your intentions, therefore staff had the right to deny your appeal. See you in 7d (In a not toxic tone) :(
 
Multiple people have been doing this for days but now they decide to ban someone, kind of outrageous but exploits are punishable no matter your intentions, therefore staff had the right to deny your appeal. See you in 7d (In a not toxic tone) :(
Like I said before, it's not an exploit. That is why I am confused.
 
Now, before you all start going "OMG NOBODY ASKED OMG WE DON'T CARE" Just hear me out this one time thanks.

So, I was banned for something where I am given god mode for an event, but I am at spawn. I can't harm anyone and nobody can harm me. It is just a fun little thing to do, and it kind of spread ever since 1pick streamed it.

Now, here is the problem with my ban. I was not exploiting nor abusing a glitch. I've seen people say that even if you do glitch for anything, you'll get banned, I differ. According to the Invadedlands rules...


Notice how it says "No glitch abusing / exploiting?" Yeah, what I was doing was not an exploit. Here is the dictionary definition of exploit and abuse in case you're not the intelligent type...



Notice how it says "derive benefit" and "bad effect?" Yeah, that's not what I was doing. What am I gaining from not being able to do anything? Nothing, right? So how was I banned for something not on the rules? I used common sense, went to the rules before deciding to do it, and noticed it only said if it is abused or exploited, which it wasn't.

I fail to see how I was exploiting this glitch whatsoever, and I believe I was banned unfairly. Thank you for your time.
doesn't matter abt intentions, you still knowingly glitched the server. also, since you want to use definitions..
"to take advantage of a flaw in a computer system" is an exploit. have fun complaining on the forums LMFAO it'll get you absolutely nowhere
 
That's where you're wrong. It says that only exploited / abused glitches are bannable. If normal glitches were also bannable, they would not have needed the exploited / abused part in it. No matter your intentions is only for if you are abusing a glitch or exploiting one.
also you're completely ignoring their statement about intentions to read into definitions to pretend you've found a loophole very cool so smart omg
 
doesn't matter abt intentions, you still knowingly glitched the server. also, since you want to use definitions..
"to take advantage of a flaw in a computer system" is an exploit. have fun complaining on the forums LMFAO it'll get you absolutely nowhere
"Computer system" Sure seems like I am hacking into someone's computer here. Take more time to search some stuff up as well, because what you said is flawed.
 
also you're completely ignoring their statement about intentions to read into definitions to pretend you've found a loophole very cool so smart omg
Yet again, what I did does not match the rules. intentions about an exploit, and mine was not.
 
Now, before you all start going "OMG NOBODY ASKED OMG WE DON'T CARE" Just hear me out this one time thanks.

So, I was banned for something where I am given god mode for an event, but I am at spawn. I can't harm anyone and nobody can harm me. It is just a fun little thing to do, and it kind of spread ever since 1pick streamed it.

Now, here is the problem with my ban. I was not exploiting nor abusing a glitch. I've seen people say that even if you do glitch for anything, you'll get banned, I differ. According to the Invadedlands rules...


Notice how it says "No glitch abusing / exploiting?" Yeah, what I was doing was not an exploit. Here is the dictionary definition of exploit and abuse in case you're not the intelligent type...



Notice how it says "derive benefit" and "bad effect?" Yeah, that's not what I was doing. What am I gaining from not being able to do anything? Nothing, right? So how was I banned for something not on the rules? I used common sense, went to the rules before deciding to do it, and noticed it only said if it is abused or exploited, which it wasn't.

I fail to see how I was exploiting this glitch whatsoever, and I believe I was banned unfairly. Thank you for your time.
It sucks but its only a week. Also to me, it sounds smart to just not do that to be on the safe side
 
General Discussion
Back