Please lock staff this is going to get out of hand and make a massive argument.
My friend already appealed, but it got rejected. The problem is, that flured knows, that he doesn't have to add any evidence, therefore he abuses this privilege to give false bans.just appeal and say you hacked or if you didn’t say you did not it’s is not that hard @icynacc rephrase my sentence
bruh just confess ab it then his time will get reduced and say “yes i cheated and i learned my lesson”My friend already appealed, but it got rejected. The problem is, that flured knows, that he doesn't have to add any evidence, therefore he abuses this privilege to give false bans.
Also there were 3 other people with Renny and none of them saw that he hacked. This situation is bizarre in both ways - that abusers can just get away with it, because they don't have to provide any evidence and speaking out about it is just "this will get into many arguments, so just close it". If someone does wrong it shouldn't be tolerated and that is why I am here to speak out about it.
so u wish someone the worst bc they ''false banned'' someone?My friend already appealed, but it got rejected. The problem is, that flured knows, that he doesn't have to add any evidence, therefore he abuses this privilege to give false bans.
Also there were 3 other people with Renny and none of them saw that he hacked. This situation is bizarre in both ways - that abusers can just get away with it, because they don't have to provide any evidence and speaking out about it is just "this will get into many arguments, so just close it". If someone does wrong it shouldn't be tolerated and that is why I am here to speak out about it.
then why dont you speak to a mod privately instead of making it public?My friend already appealed, but it got rejected. The problem is, that flured knows, that he doesn't have to add any evidence, therefore he abuses this privilege to give false bans.
Also there were 3 other people with Renny and none of them saw that he hacked. This situation is bizarre in both ways - that abusers can just get away with it, because they don't have to provide any evidence and speaking out about it is just "this will get into many arguments, so just close it". If someone does wrong it shouldn't be tolerated and that is why I am here to speak out about it.
also its kinda the job of a staffmember to ban hackers.My friend already appealed, but it got rejected. The problem is, that flured knows, that he doesn't have to add any evidence, therefore he abuses this privilege to give false bans.
Also there were 3 other people with Renny and none of them saw that he hacked. This situation is bizarre in both ways - that abusers can just get away with it, because they don't have to provide any evidence and speaking out about it is just "this will get into many arguments, so just close it". If someone does wrong it shouldn't be tolerated and that is why I am here to speak out about it.