This Needs to Stop

[IcyHotHead]

[Insert Staff Name Here] ReQuEsTiNg LoCk

 

[vunsh]

[Insert Staff Name Here] ReQuEsTiNg LoCk

well i mean there are a lot of posts that fall under at least one of these categories
1. question has been answered
2. toxicity
3. Public fight that can be taken to DM's
4. Post boosting/spam

 

[Brizly]

Staff members have "Feel free to tag me to lock threads!" in their signature. And it could make staff's work a bit easier.

 

[_Cm]

@ApexWasabi ?

 

[Captmarshmellow]

@ApexWasabi ?

Your digging your own grave here

I’ll get you the shovel

 

[Krypto]

[Insert Staff Name Here] ReQuEsTiNg LoCk

what's wrong with it

 

[Fitzey]

Yeah, some people abuse the

[Insert Staff Name Here] ReQuEsTiNg LoCk

but there’s nothing wrong with it.

well i mean there are a lot of posts that fall under at least one of these categories
1. question has been answered
2. toxicity
3. Public fight that can be taken to DM's
4. Post boosting/spam

^^^

 

[Subsy]

Think it would be easier for the staff to review posts with negative aspects if a member simply just @s the staff, which will then get a notification and it really doesn’t hurt anyone by doing so. This literally just helps the thread get looked at sooner and could minimize the continuation of the issue.

 

[Brizly]

Think it would be easier for the staff to review posts with negative aspects if a member simply just @s the staff, which will then get a notification and it really doesn’t hurt anyone by doing so. This literally just helps the thread get looked at sooner and could minimize the continuation of the issue.

^

 

[fwequentie]

what's wrong with it

Its hella annoying

 

[Nicki]

If it doesn't need to be locked, we'll usually just ignore it. Would be helpful if we were only tagged in threads 100% deserving of it though (answered threads, locking due to toxicity, or someone creating multiple pointless/spam threads).

 

[fwequentie]

If it doesn't need to be locked, we'll usually just ignore it. Would be helpful if we were only tagged in threads 100% deserving of it though (answered threads, locking due to toxicity, or someone creating multiple pointless/spam threads).

Ye you can ignore it but you still need to put efford in that. So theyre still annoying you. And wasting ur time cuz you need to check if its a good call to listen to the minimods or not

 

[vunsh]

Ye you can ignore it but you still need to put efford in that. So theyre still annoying you. And wasting ur time cuz you need to check if its a good call to listen to the minimods or not

well thats the point of locking, its to help regulate the forums

 

[ItsYaBoiAlex14]

You know this reminds me of a vid theoriginalace made were he introduces the "helper" rank a rank given to all the mini mods but it has no staff power. That way we know who's a staff wannabe

 

[fwequentie]

well thats the point of locking, its to help regulate the forums

Thats bot thr ooint cuz she still needs to put efford and time into that to check if its really true what the minimkds say so you might let them check for themselves instead of checking for them