KID i already tagged him, you quoted it, and tagged him to. that means he is going to have 4 notifications for the same thing. u don't need to bounce off me budur right.
@Decay lock plz
KID i already tagged him, you quoted it, and tagged him to. that means he is going to have 4 notifications for the same thing. u don't need to bounce off me budur right.
@Decay lock plz
Lstfu
Ok @Periys I would like to respectfully disagree. There is multiple staff that have said that they are okay with us doing this if it is actually getting out of hand. I don't do it all the time but obviously this thread was answered by you and there was no need for this thread to be open. Decay and Nicki have told many of us that they are okay with us tagging them, and there has been other staff that have had in their signature to tag them for locks.Because there's absolutely no need to lock it. Please stop requesting locks and let the moderators do their job. We don't need you to tell us how to do it. Thanks.
The question has been answered, so what? If people want to continue having a conversation, fine by me. It's doing no harm. Calm down.


ur right.
@Decay lock plz
Sucks you lost it. but staff cant give you another reaction word for these reasonsso if any staff see this - i had a chat reaction but then accidently got killed and lost it. I dont have it anymore but I do have proof of having it.
View attachment 1833
please help
Excluding the fact that the original poster wanted the thread to be locked (which would be the only valid reason at this point), there's nothing wrong with keeping the thread open. Just because a staff member answered it doesn't mean it has to be locked immediately. Sure, other staff members have done it, but it's not a requirement for every thread; there's always a possibility that new ideas can be discussed related or pertaining to the thread.Ok @Periys I would like to respectfully disagree. There is multiple staff that have said that they are okay with us doing this if it is actually getting out of hand. I don't do it all the time but obviously this thread was answered by you and there was no need for this thread to be open. Decay and Nicki have told many of us that they are okay with us tagging them, and there has been other staff that have had in their signature to tag them for locks.
View attachment 1849View attachment 1850
This simply isn't having a conversation my friend. If they want to have one it can be taken elsewhere. This conversation is on this thread if you haven't noticed.
The kid also asks for his own thread to be locked, which at this point would be a justified reason to request a lock.
I never said it was required, I tag staff in threads that don’t get locked. Just because I thought it was worthy of a lock doesn’t mean the staff does, I ping them so they can check it.Excluding the fact that the original poster wanted the thread to be locked (which would be the only valid reason at this point), there's nothing wrong with keeping the thread open. Just because a staff member answered it doesn't mean it has to be locked immediately. Sure, other staff members have done it, but it's not a requirement for every thread; there's always a possibility that new ideas can be discussed related or pertaining to the thread.
Yet when Periys didn't lock (for whatever reason) you couldn't accept that and wanted to respond to him for what reason?I never said it was required, I tag staff in threads that don’t get locked. Just because I thought it was worthy of a lock doesn’t mean the staff does, I ping them so they can check it.
You linked pictures of people not having conversations, but you can also just report them if they were post posting. You left out the other screenshots of people actually replying things that were related to the thread, etc.Periys’ argument was weak in the area that people are trying to have conversations, but from the pictures linked that isn’t having conversation. There is other threads that can be used for those purposes and being able to message on someone’s profile is actually one way of doing that since you don’t actually get points for commenting on a profile. That is the way the forums were intended to be used and no one has had an actual issue with it other than Periys. Not to call him out and say he’s wrong, but this thread has no point in being open anymore. The kid had a question and it was answered. How are “new ideas” supposed to be created over a kid asking if he could get his chat reaction back because he died with it? If there’s nothing that can be done about it then nothing can be done about it. End of story, end of thread.
The forums have gotten to that point where threads HAVE to be managed even if they are in off-topic.
that's a bit contradictory (when it comes to handling threads on forums)I never said it was required
I believe the only reason why this would even be able to be considered "out of hand" would be your backtalk to @Periys . Respectfully disagreeing is one thing, but you have a tendency to constantly argue with people over the simplest things as you cannot take no for an answer. While that doesn't really do anything to your points or arguments in this post, it's something that we can all agree on and know where this situation is going.People get out of hand with it and think “since it’s in off-topic, no one cares” and they start making threads about inappropriate stuff, post boosting 5 messages in a row, I mean the list goes on. I had done 3 reports yesterday over that kind of stuff, and if those threads weren’t locked including ones like these, that would be something that consistently happened.
why did u need to tag him again lolur right.
@Decay lock plz